by Jared Strong, Iowa Capital Dispatch
May 3, 2023
A researcher at the University of Iowa says two Republican senators pressed the university to halt his blog — which included unflattering critiques of the state’s agricultural practices... more
The two Iowa agriculture department employees primarily responsible for inspecting the troubled Cricket Hollow Zoo have been critical – in emails to superiors and on social media sites – of citizens filing animal welfare complaints against the facility near Manchester.
In emails obtained by bettendorf.com through a Freedom of Information request from the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship (IDALS), one state inspector calls the citizens who reported concerns about animal care at the zoo as being part of "the complaint crowd," and suggests in a May 2013 email to his boss – the state's top veterinarian – that future complaints by the animal welfare activists will likely be unfounded.". . . she (the zoo owner) is well aware that they will probably be back and is making conscious efforts to make her facility completely ready for their visits. I am sure they will complain anyway," the inspector wrote to Dr. David Schmitt, the state veterinarian who reports to Iowa ag secretary Bill Northey.
Another inspector in the emails obtained under the FOI is alleged to have posted negative comments on the Iowa Animal Welfare Alliance web site forum stating: "When are you people going to get a real job? Get a life."
Asked about the biased comments by state inspectors, Dustin Vande Hoef, the ag department's spokesman, said: "The statements do not reflect the position of the department. We have and will continue to take all animal welfare complaints very seriously."
Neither Schmitt or Northey would respond to requests for an interview about the department's handling of Cricket Hollow Zoo complaints by staff members.
CLICK HERE to view photos taken by the Iowa ag department of the Cricket Hollow Zoo inspection in February 2013
Citing confidentiality of employee personnel files, Vande Hoef would not say if either of the inspectors were disciplined in regard to their comments/posting about animal welfare complaints against Cricket Hollow Zoo.
Other emails obtained from the ag department also indicate inspectors downplayed conditions they observed during inspections at the facility. In an exchange of emails about a February 2013 inspection of the zoo, one inspector suggests softening the content of the state report in order to avoid encouraging future complaints about the facility.
The inspector suggests in the email that the report should delete the comment "housekeeping could have been better."
Saying if the comment isn't clarified with what improvements need to be done at the zoo, the comment "will add fuel to the fire."
"My thoughts are to leave this statement out since you mentioned in the next paragraph about some bedding issues," the state inspector stated in the email.
The second state inspector responded stating he "only made casual mention of it because it did not affect the standard of care as far as causing adverse health or suffering and that's all we were there to judge. I can take it ("housekeeping could have been better") out if Dave (state vet Dr. David Schmitt) wishes and he hasn't already forwarded it on. Dave?"
The state vet wrote back to the inspector saying he had "already sent it (the inspection report) on, discussed the investigation and from the report I believe the case is closed."
It was during an inspection by USDA – also in February 2013 – that three violations were noted at the zoo involving sanitation and drainage issues. The violations were among 25 for which the zoo was cited between 2011 and 2013 and later fined nearly $7,000. The February 2013 violations found by the USDA's APHIS (Animal and Plant Helath Inspection Service) included:
CLICK HERE to view photos taken by the Iowa ag department of the Cricket Hollow Zoo during the February 2013 inspection.
The zoo is currently under investigation by the federal agency. Meanwhile, the state ag department has yet to issue any fines against the zoo, and reports by state inspectors continue to paint a much different picture of animal conditions at the zoo than the federal reports and inspections.
The zoo has a federal permit allowing the display of wild animals, but the state also oversees the zoo operations charging a yearly fee for a license.
by Jared Strong, Iowa Capital Dispatch
May 3, 2023
A researcher at the University of Iowa says two Republican senators pressed the university to halt his blog — which included unflattering critiques of the state’s agricultural practices... more
by Jared Strong, Iowa Capital Dispatch
April 14, 2023
A lawsuit by three journalists who allege Gov. Kim Reynolds violated the state’s Open Records Law should continue in district court to determine whether her responses to their... more
Amid a steep fall-off in earnings, forced unpaid furloughs across its 77 news properties, significant staff cuts and a continued stock price decline, top Lee Enterprise, Inc. executives received increased compensation packages from 7 to 62 percent during 2022.
The executive compensation... more
Lee Enterprises, Inc. finally filed its full fiscal 2022 financial report Tuesday (Feb. 27) with the U.S. Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), two months later than normal.
The annual 10-K report showed the company lost 35 cents per share for the 12 months ended Sept. 25, or 14 cents... more
Powered by Drupal | Skifi theme by Worthapost | Customized by GAH, Inc.